11 months ago
24
YOUR AD HERE
News
Hand-picked NewsTop Member
The new Panelist disagreed, throwing out these claims, as the new UDRP presented no fresh data on the case.
Not only was the case denied on behalf of the Respondent, the Panelist found the Complainant guilty of engaging in Reverse Domain Name Hijacking:
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
English (US) ·