Advising someone to basically go the RDNH route probably not a good idea

In what can only be described as a clown show of an X thread, one participant stood out as a shining example of why you do not take unsolicited legal advice.

You can read the whole thing on X.

TL;DR Startup named Camel (not a great brand imo because the tobacco company is so well known and you are never getting the .com)

Founder offers $200 for Camel.ai that owner paid $40K

Founder wants to know why they bought if not using it.

Founder’s cliche: “They are squatters” “Scammers” “Domains not used should be forfeited”

Domain Investors fire back, my reply was that it’s interesting an AI company wants to talk about morality. Use other people’s work to train your LLM/Ai but do not pay the content creators. That’s immoral.

Then we get the genius who gives the advice, file trademark, make a record of the squatter stating it has no intention to use. File a UDRP or ACPA. They left out commit fraud as the domain owner never stated they had not intention to never use.

John Berryhill entered the fray and replied to the non lawyer. https://twitter.com/Berryhillj/status/1821680680465498216

It looks like the startup registered a bunch of domain names at reg fee. UseCamel.com, Camel.sh, MyCamel.ai and a few others.